Inspiration is the first step of the journey. It begins with the suspicion of
possibility.
"That guy says I can do more, be more, that I can get from here to point B; is
he right?"
The process that follows is based on a couple of assumptions. First, the source
of our suspicion is credible to us and second, what they're suggesting I can
achieve is something that matters to me.
"You can hang out with celebrities, have your own chauffer and drink Champipple
for breakfast JUST LIKE ME!" the granddaughter of a wealthy hotel chain founder
proclaims.
"Only if I marry you," I respond.
The woman has not worked a day in her life and has no idea what it's like to
exist in my point A. She could no more relate to my life than I could to hers.
Further, I have no interest in hanging out with celebrities and what on earth is
Champipple? She has no credibility and has not tempted me with her point B for
one second; think I'll flip the channel.
An well-dressed, imposing black man shares with his audience an inspirational
phrase his mother taught him:
"You can only depend on yourself. The cavalry ain't coming."
The man is Christopher Gardener, CEO of his own stockbrokerage firm, Gardner
Rich & Co, based in Chicago, Illinois. His life is the subject of the movie "The
Pursuit of Happiness" starring Will Smith. Gardener grew up poor in a household
surrounded by violence, child abuse, fear, alcoholism and illiteracy, things he
determined would not be part of his adult life. He struggled with failed
relationships, betrayal by prospective employers and homelessness on the streets
of San Francisco before reaching his point B, success as a financier.
Is this guy credible to me? You'd better believe it! Anything I've suffered in
my lifeā¦forget it! Chris suffered, I was merely offended. Life beat him
mercilessly; it slapped me on the wrist. But I notice this guy has two arms, two
legs, a head and I bet he gets naked before he showers just like me. Credible?
Absolutely! Point B worth shooting for? Yep, no doubt. And to ice the cake he
even said something I glom onto philosophically:
"Find something that you love. Something that gets you so excited you can't wait
to get out of bed in the morning. Forget about money. Be happy."
Happy sounds good to me.
I now begin to suspect that what my inspiration source has suggested is
possible for me.
I'm ready to acknowledge the possibility before me and my interest in
obtaining it;
"I'll bet I could be/do/have that!"
But before proceeding I need a reason to do so as well as confidence in my
ability to reach the desired end. These two steps are not necessarily linear;
while we're only capable of thinking one thought at a time we will give both of
these aspects sufficient consideration before moving on. Enter pain and
pleasure.
Sigmund Freud suggested that every action we humans take is based on either
our pursuit of pleasure or avoidance of pain.
(I have given his "Pleasure Principle" a great deal of thought and have
found no exception so I will proceed as if his theory is indeed fact.) And these
are the things we will consider; what pleasure awaits me if I reach point B?
What pain might I experience if I get there? One's evaluation may take a form
similar to "If____then____but." For example:
"If I jump out of an airplane then I'll feel a freedom unlike any I've
experienced before. And it will be the adrenaline rush of a lifetime. And my
friends will think I'm a gonzo wild man and tell stories to their grandchildren
about me! But the 'chute may not open in which case I'll plunge to a gruesome
death."
"If I become a doctor then I'll make lots of money and join the country club and
cure people who will then see me as a hero. But I may not like the job after
investing lots of years and thousands of dollars."
"If I get sober then I'll become a better father and spouse, and I'll hold down
a job and join the country club like the doctor across the street. But if I fall
off the wagon it will give me another reference that I am and always will be a
drunk; frankly, I'm afraid of trying and failing."
Who will win, pain or pleasure?
Of course there is no way of predicting but it will depend to a large extent
on which side of the "but" you focus more of your attention. And to complicate
things there are "likelihoods" to consider. Frankly, the sky diver has a
statistically better chance than the drunk--but only they can decide whether or
not to proceed. Let's assume pleasure wins out and our subject proceeds. Does he have
the "right stuff" to reach his point B?